Hi Dan,
Thanks for that. I guess the AMA has not deleted it from the rules proposals page.
I am not too familier with the rules proposals cycle. Will the cycle timing allow this event be approved for next year?
ED
Search found 5 matches
- Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:45 am
- Forum: Electric Pylon Racing
- Topic: Electric Formula Rules (EF1) Proposed Rules
- Replies: 32
- Views: 27699
- Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:56 pm
- Forum: Electric Pylon Racing
- Topic: Electric Formula Rules (EF1) Proposed Rules
- Replies: 32
- Views: 27699
Re: Electric Formula Rules (EF1) Proposed Rules
Is this battery rule correct. The first is as printed on the NMPRA site, the second is as submitted to the AMA for rules approval. The weight is different. If the second is a misprint it should be changed before it becomes the AMA rule. Can you imagine the arguing? b. Maximum Battery Weight: Motor b...
- Tue May 04, 2010 8:20 am
- Forum: Electric Pylon Racing
- Topic: Electric Formula Rules (EF1) Proposed Rules
- Replies: 32
- Views: 27699
Re: Electric Formula Rules (EF1) Proposed Rules
Hi Randy, Yes I will be racing this event. I am kind of waiting until the final rules are approved. There was a considerable difference between the first draft and the current one. Understandably so. To start from scratch is still a bit of an expense. I would hate to get set up only to find minor ro...
- Mon May 03, 2010 4:27 pm
- Forum: Electric Pylon Racing
- Topic: Electric Formula Rules (EF1) Proposed Rules
- Replies: 32
- Views: 27699
Re: Electric Formula Rules (EF1) Proposed Rules
I realise this will go nowhere. The refly rule always mystifies me. As long as a pilot takes off he gets the refly. WHY? IF, after takeoff a competitor crashes or double cuts he is out of that heat. ZERO!. Because of incompetence or cheating. A few laps after our incompetent cheater is disqualified,...
- Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:02 am
- Forum: Electric Pylon Racing
- Topic: Electric Formula Rules (EF1) Proposed Rules
- Replies: 32
- Views: 27699
Re: Electric Formula Rules (EF1) Proposed Rules
New language,
Second sentence after 16.5.1
Is that a misprint or am I confused?
Ed S
Second sentence after 16.5.1
Is that a misprint or am I confused?
Ed S